THIS MAKES MY STOMACH TURN!

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

February 5th, 2002, 02:45 AM
BeaverCleaver

From the Cleaver household, RACKS go to the following:

ELGrande
Jimmy Medallions
The 80's Man

I agree with your viewpionts 100%.

------------------
sweet-pea, kicking her own ass:
quote:
Originally posted by sweet-pea:
APPOLOGIES is the plural form of Apology.
I wasn't trying to spell aplogize...
can you fucking read, or do you need a phonics thread opened.

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Sexual Frustration Troll:
my new auto sig should be: Stuart Smalley can suck mah ass!!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
February 5th, 2002, 02:33 PM
ElGRANDPEEHOLE

A short review of this thread.

Let's take a look at a few of the clones who don't see anything wrong with homosexuality being shoved down our collective throats (pardon the pun).

Friend of Queers - Don't know much about this fuckstick, except that he enjoys watching two men engage in hideous sexual acts. And he sees nothing wrong with two hairy sweaty men, engaging in anal pumping.

Indecent Bisexual - Enough said. The bitch has eaten more pussy than 85% of the men on this board.

Smokinpotfroma Can - Dude keeps the Colombian drug smugglers, in furs, cars, and exotic homes. http://www.hostboard.com/forums/

Smokie Chan,
Dude, you can't be serious? You cannot honestly tell me that you believe homosexuality is innate!!!!!! Do you also believe drug addictions to be innate? Hell no they're not. They're both learned behaviors! And the more, and more homosexuality is portrayed as normalcy (is that a word?), the more manseed sifters we're going to see tapping other men's upper sigmoids!

I want to give a shout out, and a big hearty RACK out to all who have come to see the light.
Jimmy Meds, The 80's Man (this guy gained mountains of respect from elgrande in this thread), Steve Sax, Sudden Sam, rozy, The Big Pickle, Incoherent Grandstander (not sure who this Troll is, but racks to him anyway), Buttspray, Norm Johnson, and Beaver Cleaver.

Homosexuality is spreading faster than AIDS (which by the way was spread via the homosexual community), and it's time we get a handle on it, before it's too late!

WAR VOTE REPUBLICAN!!!!!!!!!

------------------
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Dr Bob:
TTB, I see. Kinda like the game fuck your buddy, or screw your neighbor, or whatever it is called. Actually sounds like a lot of fun....<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
February 5th, 2002, 02:40 PM
Smackie Chan

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by ElGRANDPEEHOLE:

Homosexuality is spreading faster than AIDS (which by the way was spread via the homosexual community), and it's time we get a handle on it, before it's too late!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Oh, I see where your paranoia stems from. You're afraid you might catch it.

------------------
Hey pal...you just blow in from Stupidtown?
February 5th, 2002, 02:57 PM
ElGRANDPEEHOLE

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Smackie Chan:
Oh, I see where your paranoia stems from. You're afraid you might catch it.

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

No Smokie, not afraid, and not paranoid!
The facts speak for themselves. Homosexuals have an agenda, and that agenda is to distroy the family structure (Husband, Wife, and Kids), and replace it with their own (Husband/Wife, Husband/Wife, and Future cock suckers).
Ten years ago, I'd have laughed in your face, if you had told me that gay couple would be able to marry legally, and be afforded the same marrital rights as a man and wife. Now it's already happening in Vermount.
Also, in San Francriscoamalesassup, City employees can have sex changes, which are paid for by their health coverage. THAT'S JUST PLAIN FUCKING WRONG!

------------------
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Dr Bob:
TTB, I see. Kinda like the game fuck your buddy, or screw your neighbor, or whatever it is called. Actually sounds like a lot of fun....<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
February 5th, 2002, 03:07 PM
Smackie Chan

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by ElGRANDPEEHOLE:

Homosexuals have an agenda, and that agenda is to distroy the family structure (Husband, Wife, and Kids), and replace it with their own (Husband/Wife, Husband/Wife, and Future cock suckers).<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Actually, their agenda is the same as that of heteros -- to get a nut.

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>

Also, in San Francriscoamalesassup, City employees can have sex changes, which are paid for by their health coverage. THAT'S JUST PLAIN FUCKING WRONG!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

If it was being paid for out of public funds I'd agree with you. If the health providers paying for it are private, which I'm sure they are, they can choose to cover whatever they want.

------------------
Hey pal...you just blow in from Stupidtown?
February 5th, 2002, 03:15 PM
ElGRANDPEEHOLE

Actually, their agenda is the same as that of heteros -- to get a nut.

The difference being, is that their nuts, which are expelled into the deep reaches of another mans colon. CAN NOT reproduce LIFE! Therefore threatening the very existence of the human species!!!!!!!

And what should it matter whether or not private health coverage is their means for coverage. I'm pretty sure their are people funding their coverage WHO ARE AGAINST IT! But as is typical in Cali, you can't speak out against this sick perversion without fear of reprisal. Which I guess you're right. If those people against it, don't have enough balls to stand up for what they believe in. Then fuck em! Keep paying for manseed lovers to have a surgery, that God never intended.

------------------
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Dr Bob:
TTB, I see. Kinda like the game fuck your buddy, or screw your neighbor, or whatever it is called. Actually sounds like a lot of fun....<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
February 5th, 2002, 03:30 PM
Ruff Dogg

El, you claim that homos are learned. Just when was it that you "learned" your sexuality? Let me guess, you'll come back with "homosexuality is learned and heterosexuality is innate" right? Well, maybe you do like to have it both ways. http://www.hostboard.com/forums/

------------------
Yeah, you're one of them.
February 5th, 2002, 03:32 PM
mvscal

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by ElGRANDPEEHOLE:
The difference being, is that their nuts, which are expelled into the deep reaches of another mans colon. CAN NOT reproduce LIFE! Therefore threatening the very existence of the human species!!!!!!!
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Nonsense. Your fist can't reproduce life either. How many "future generations" have you blown into a hanky? There aren't enough faggots to have a statistically significant impact on the human population.

Faggots shouldn't adopt kids because they're mentally ill perverts, not because they're a threat to the human species.

------------------
February 5th, 2002, 03:34 PM
Rickey Henderson

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Norm Johnson:
straight men want to be able to plug any juicy soft twat possible while grabbing plump tits.
I'm not sure us straight men dream about being able to stick our cocks up any hairy male rectum at any time.
GO fuck yourself, you stupid fuck.
What a stupid fucking statement.

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Rickey rack that shit!

------------------
It's hard to make a Jaguar looks like a Volkswagon
February 5th, 2002, 03:35 PM
Ruff Dogg

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by ElGRANDPEEHOLE:
[B. CAN NOT reproduce LIFE! Therefore threatening the very existence of the human species!!!!!!!

[/B]<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

So the purpose of every sexual act should be procreation and every act that is incapable of this is wrong??!!

------------------
Yeah, you're one of them.
February 5th, 2002, 03:40 PM
Jimmy Medalions

Originally posted by Smackie Chan:

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>I think God "intended" for humans to do everything they're capable of doing, good and bad.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

By this rationale, God is apparently down with murder, rape and other self-absorbed pursuits. He intended for us to kill one another huh?

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>If you believe He's the ultimate judge, then it really doesn't matter if punishment for wrongful deeds isn't carried out here in this existence, 'cuz he'll make sure there's justice in the afterlife.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

So the rest of us, as citizens, have no right to dictate how the behaviors of these people affect our soceity? We need not be concerned about the deterioration of values, the proliferation of drugs and STDs? Care to look at the per-capita figures for gays vs. straights? Methinks no.

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>If homosexuality is the abomination you believe it to be, then you can sleep soundly knowing that when you get to Heaven, you won't have to deal with homos there.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I have one gay friend, who is in the 2% minority of gays who avoid that which I find disgusting about gays. Drugs, STDs, disrespect for values, etc. Even he is repulsed by the shit he sees on a daily basis (no pun intended http://www.hostboard.com/forums/) You're off-track.

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>I'm guessing that in the overall scheme of things, God doesn't really give a hamster's ass about human sexuality. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

You'd be guessing wrong. Had He not given a hamster's ass, he wouldn't have first created a penis, with all of it's appointments, and THEN created the vagina, along with its appointments. They are functionally co-dependent.

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>While He might get pissed about rape, whether it be a man raping a woman or another man, I doubt that He spends much time worrying about what consenting adults do amongst themselves. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I don't think He worries either. In the end, He'll drop-kick deserving nimrod's asses accordingly. The goal is to be a self-governing society, I think that's what He'd have hoped for. Gays don't bring that to the table.

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>And since, IMO, homosexuality is not a choice but is innate, then God has no one to blame but Himself for its existence.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Then you and I disagree on this point. If you look at the background of gays, you'll note strife and family issues from an early age. Or you'll note manipulation by others. In any event, it is a choice in my mind. Further, whether by choice or by birth, homosexuality is not a license to carry on in a manner that is diametrically-opposed to soceity's interests. Drugs, diseases, and promiscuity to that degree were never okay by society, or God himself.

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>The way I understand Christianity works is that you can be the most promiscuous, hedonistic drug user ever known, but as long as you confess, repent, and accept Christ, you still get to go to Heaven. I'd bet the same applies to queers. So I'm not really sure of what the impact is of doing something that God may not have intended, since everyone, regardless of how evil he/she may have been here on Earth, can enter His kingdom by simply saying a last-minute apology. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

In some respects, it is unfortunate that this is the case, no? (Orenthal, Manson, Ray Lewis, et. al.)

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>If God is indeed fair, I fail to see how someone like, say, Hitler, could have the potential to get into Heaven by repenting and accepting Christ after all the shit he pulled, while decent, law-abiding, non-murderous Christian homos might be denied entry regardless of whether they repented, simply because they were gay. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I don't disagree. The notion of earning your way is thrown out the window. And for that I really don't have an answer. I only have opinions about what we as humans can control on our own, here on the ground. Living our lives in proper moral fashion, caring for the betterment of society, etc. Homosexuals have no interest in doing these kinds of things, as evidenced by their behavior. If you reject my characterization of these people, I suggest you take a trip to West Hollywood some night, and just visit a few clubs. You'll quickly come to realize just how amoral and anti-culture these hedonists are, and you might even stop making excuses for them. Maybe http://www.hostboard.com/forums/

[/B][/QUOTE]

------------------
inaacpkyfag - (n) 1. the art of kicking one's own ass 2. the act of knowing you're a worthless piece of shit 3. slang a board bitch
February 5th, 2002, 03:52 PM
Buttspray

Smackie -

I can ignore fags. I can do my thing and they can do their's. BUT - when fags try to force it down the rest of our throats that it's OK, and we should suck their dicks because they are discriminated against, fuck them.

And even more so, I don't want a fucking liberal teacher trying to tell my child that getting a shit-dick with 2 pair of nuts slapping each other is a great and normal thing to do. It's NOT normal. Look at the fucking majority of people! Educators don't deserve the right to intrude that much into children's minds. If they grow up gay and fucked up, so be it. If they're straight, they don't need to hear about it....

------------------
<A HREF="http://160.79.129.225/waves/10110/fart3112.wav" TARGET=_blank>Click on this for what I really think of you!

</A>
February 5th, 2002, 03:59 PM
Morten Andersen

Rack the ever-living fat fukken rat piss out of this thread and to the following:
Jimmy Meds
Buttspray
ELGRANDE

anyone else who is interested in keeping it real.

------------------
Just call me the Great Dane
February 5th, 2002, 05:24 PM
Jsc810

I don't feel like getting into another shouting match on this topic (however, I would join a legitimate debate, point versus point, without all the name calling, but that probably is not possible here).

But for you homophobes, here is something for you to chew on. http://www.hostboard.com/forums/

------------------
New Orleans Troll Stop
April 5-6, 2002
February 5th, 2002, 05:39 PM
Buttspray

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Ruff Dogg:
Are there really any teachers out there that are telling kids that homosexuality is great? I doubt it. Aren't teachers trying to teach kids to get along with others, even if other people aren't exactly like themselves?

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Shawn Hannity was discussing it yesterday. Evidently, there's a group of people like you who want normal chidren to turn fucked up by talking to them about homosexuality at about the age of 10. Promoting it, and making fags feel good about themselves.

I really don't know who you are, but am sure that you're a liberal, meaningless troll, who finds pleasure in suffocating in a large container of cocksauce. You're of no importance....

------------------
<A HREF="http://160.79.129.225/waves/10110/fart3112.wav" TARGET=_blank>Click on this for what I really think of you!

</A>
February 5th, 2002, 05:51 PM
Uncle Fester

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Posted by the 80's Man
Rack the FUKK out of ELGRANDE's letter and UNWAR the cockgobbler who e-mailed back and took a piss on the Bible.
It's seargents like ELGRANDE who help us win the battles in life of preserving God, country, and ethics.
Fukk the rest of you.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

And speaking of God, Country, and ethics, he backs it up with this:

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Posted by the 80's Man:
Yessir, I just want a one-time fukk.
In and out, never call her again.
The pendulum of disrespect is about to swing, motherfukkers.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Funny stuff.

You might as well go gay, 80's Man. Do the glory hole bit and then head down to Subway with your new pals. It suits you.

Fukk you runnin through the shower at the YMCA.

------------------
February 5th, 2002, 05:57 PM
Uncle Fester

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Posted by the 80's Man
Rack the FUKK out of ELGRANDE's letter and UNWAR the cockgobbler who e-mailed back and took a piss on the Bible.
It's seargents like ELGRANDE who help us win the battles in life of preserving God, country, and ethics.
Fukk the rest of you.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

And speaking of God, Country, and ethics, he backs it up with this:

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Posted by the 80's Man:
Yessir, I just want a one-time fukk.
In and out, never call her again.
The pendulum of disrespect is about to swing, motherfukkers.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Funny stuff.

You might as well go gay, 80's Man. Do the glory hole bit and then head down to Subway with your new pals. It suits you.

Fukk you runnin through the shower at the YMCA.

------------------
February 5th, 2002, 06:18 PM
ElGRANDPEEHOLE

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Buttspray:
Shawn Hannity was discussing it yesterday. Evidently, there's a group of people like you who want normal chidren to turn fucked up by talking to them about homosexuality at about the age of 10. Promoting it, and making fags feel good about themselves.

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

That group of people is the HOMOSEXUAL COMMUNITY! Homosexual defenders like PeterPuff Dogg, who obviously has no children, fuel their fire.
Props Buttspray, continue the cruisade my good man.

------------------
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Dr Bob:
TTB, I see. Kinda like the game fuck your buddy, or screw your neighbor, or whatever it is called. Actually sounds like a lot of fun....<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
February 5th, 2002, 06:25 PM
The 80's Man

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Uncle Fester:
And speaking of God, Country, and ethics, he backs it up with this:

Quote:

Posted by the 80's Man:
Yessir, I just want a one-time fukk.
In and out, never call her again.
The pendulum of disrespect is about to swing, motherfukkers.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Funny stuff.

That's called a Political Fukk, dude. You just can't see the big picture. A chick who dresses kinky-like is in need and asking for the one-time fukk.
It is my fukkin DUTY to lay the wood to her after she went through the trouble of buying leopard panties and tried to expose the tops of them. By banging her (a whack chick headed for gothism), I (the damn General) install some STABILITY and STRUCTURE in her life.
SHe's kind of ugly, but her effort in wearing the leopard undies warrants one honorable and noble fukk from a damn General who has VISION. A kinky, half-goth chick CANNOT have a lasting relationship with a damn General, a "simple man without the words to make things right," as Gary Puckett once sang. Thanks to my VISION, I can see that this relationship would not foster. I am honorable enough to recognize this and not hurt either of us by trying a long-lasting relationiship that cannot work. Thus, the next best thing would be the gift of a one-time fukk. Her being able to tell her fellow antique store friends, "I got some General Dikk" is enough. It's noble. It's fair. It's just. God bless America. Rack me.
-G
gotta have the fukkin vision...

------------------
fukk me running
February 5th, 2002, 06:30 PM
ElGRANDPEEHOLE

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Researchers at the University of Georgia conducted an experiment involving 35 homophobic men and 29 nonhomophobic men as measured by the Index of Homophobia scale. All the participants selected for the study described themselves as exclusively heterosexual both in terms of sexual arousal and experience.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yeah right, nice fucking article:rolleyesbigfuckingtime:!

Those supposed 35 homophobic men were planted their by the homosexual community. To further their sick agenda. How do I know you ask?
BECAUSE NO SELF RESPECTING HETEROSEXUAL MALE WOULD SIT THROUGH A SESSION OF WATCHING TWO MEN BURY THEIR PURPLE HEADED MISSILES INTO ONE ANOTHER'S RECTUMS WITHOUT THROWING UP ALL OVER HIMSELF!
Therefore, there is no doubt in my mind that this research committee was made up of entirely gay, cock slobbering researchers.

Nice try JSC, but some of us aren't buying into the lie, your homosexual community is trying to brainwash us with.

------------------
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Dr Bob:
TTB, I see. Kinda like the game fuck your buddy, or screw your neighbor, or whatever it is called. Actually sounds like a lot of fun....<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
February 5th, 2002, 06:41 PM
Jimmy Medalions

I'd love to see what these fag lovers would say if asked how they'd feel if their kid turned out to be gay.

I can see it now. "Oh, I wouldn't mind. It wouldn't bother me at all because I think being gay is okay". http://www.hostboard.com/forums/

Yeah, I'm sure none of you fag lovers would mind explaining to your friends at the supermarket who "that other guy holding the poodle" is in the Pink Christmas card they just got. http://www.hostboard.com/forums/

Buttspray, you make a very approprite link between liberals and fag supporters. The Democratic party has long been the hangout for the losers and outcasts of society, who need a fuckin' 12-step program of a political party that's willing to hear your affliction, and then in unison say "Hi Nimrod's name".

Biggest bunch of hypocritical bullshit I've ever heard.

------------------
inaacpkyfag - (n) 1. the art of kicking one's own ass 2. the act of knowing you're a worthless piece of shit 3. slang a board bitch
February 5th, 2002, 06:46 PM
Carneliat

Maybe homosexuality is God's way of curbing overpopulation. How do you know that by speaking out against it you are not pissing off your God?

------------------
"Doctor says I wouldn't get so many nose bleeds if I just kept my finger outa there"
February 5th, 2002, 06:50 PM
Friend Of Ours

Hey, who's this "God" you keep referring to? Any evidence for any such being or presence--beyond your inner gut feeling? No? So, you may as well be speaking of the "Easter Bunny" when invoking some assumed Moral Authority overseeing all your decisions and actions? Okay, just so we're clear.

The "mentally ill perverts" to whom mscvl refers are obviously not the average homosexual, but such a description does suit to a tee the priesthood of the Catholic Church. Here in S.F., as well as in Boston, the dioceses are finalizing MASSIVE payouts to the hundreds of victims of the (typical) pedophile priest.

But, if you're really concerned about children being abused by the adults charged with their care, why are you ignoring the hetero abuse of children, which is hundreds of times more common than the abuse by homos--and every bit as damaging.

Fact is, you Christian yahoos are so stupid and silly, turning your typically weak arguments over is like flipping pancakes.

------------------
February 5th, 2002, 07:05 PM
mvscal

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Friend Of Ours:
But, if you're really concerned about children being abused by the adults charged with their care, why are you ignoring the hetero abuse of children, which is hundreds of times more common than the abuse by homos--and every bit as damaging.

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Nobody is ignoring child abuse. That's why it's against the law. That's why we spend millions on social workers and other programs to help the victims of abuse.

Keep lying, faggot.

------------------
February 5th, 2002, 07:15 PM
Friend Of Ours

Well of course it's against the law, moron, but deal with the fact that hetero abuse of children is hundreds of times more prevelant (outside the church). Are you really so tunnel-visioned that you can't deal with a simple point?

------------------
February 5th, 2002, 07:17 PM
dc_15

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Friend Of Ours:
Hey, who's this "God" you keep referring to? Any evidence for any such being or presence--beyond your inner gut feeling? No? So, you may as well be speaking of the "Easter Bunny" when invoking some assumed Moral Authority overseeing all your decisions and actions? Okay, just so we're clear.

The "mentally ill perverts" to whom mscvl refers are obviously not the average homosexual, but such a description does suit to a tee the priesthood of the Catholic Church. Here in S.F., as well as in Boston, the dioceses are finalizing MASSIVE payouts to the hundreds of victims of the (typical) pedophile priest.

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

While the church does draw some Pedophiles they are not the typical Catholic preist by a long shot. You can't propogate one stereotype while battleing another. In other words, you can't be blindly anti-religious in a post combating people who are blindly homophobic.

Secondly, on the matter of the whole thread I don't know if gay couples should be able to have children. Are single mothers and fathers? Yes, are convicts out of prison? yes, both of those could potentially indoctrinate kids, but you'd hear an outcry if you even mentioned one. I do agree that there is much more of a chance the kid will get messed up coming from a homosexual household. That said I know people who have come out of homosexual households and none are gay. I think you might have a bit of an arguement though, until you start throwing around all the crap about how they can't have custody of kids because god says so. Then you're just speeking out your ass.

------------------
February 5th, 2002, 07:19 PM
The 80's Man

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by ElGRANDPEEHOLE:
Yeah right, nice fucking article:rolleyesbigfuckingtime:!

Those supposed 35 homophobic men were planted their by the homosexual community. To further their sick agenda. How do I know you ask?
BECAUSE NO SELF RESPECTING HETEROSEXUAL MALE WOULD SIT THROUGH A SESSION OF WATCHING TWO MEN BURY THEIR PURPLE HEADED MISSILES INTO ONE ANOTHER'S RECTUMS WITHOUT THROWING UP ALL OVER HIMSELF!
Therefore, there is no doubt in my mind that this research committee was made up of entirely gay, cock slobbering researchers.

Nice try JSC, but some of us aren't buying into the lie, your homosexual community is trying to brainwash us with.

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

uh, fuggity fuggity fuggin rack?
Innnnnnnndoooooobidibly!
The same pole smokers who do these bogus studies remind me of the fat ass female "scientist" who "proves" that all women have genes that cause more fat to develop in their ass and hips.
Fatass women are not fat because of their lack of exercise or the 10 Twinkies, bag of Doritoes and Diet Coke they had as a "snack," but from a "natural female gene."

Just bullshit to make them feel better.

------------------
fukk me running
February 5th, 2002, 07:21 PM
mvscal

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Friend Of Ours:
Well of course it's against the law, moron, but deal with the fact that hetero abuse of children is hundreds of times more prevelant (outside the church). Are you really so tunnel-visioned that you can't deal with a simple point?

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Your point is specious and irrelevant. The issue at hand is sick perverts adopting kids.

------------------
February 5th, 2002, 07:24 PM
The 80's Man

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by ElGRANDPEEHOLE:
Yeah right, nice fucking article:rolleyesbigfuckingtime:!

Those supposed 35 homophobic men were planted their by the homosexual community. To further their sick agenda. How do I know you ask?
BECAUSE NO SELF RESPECTING HETEROSEXUAL MALE WOULD SIT THROUGH A SESSION OF WATCHING TWO MEN BURY THEIR PURPLE HEADED MISSILES INTO ONE ANOTHER'S RECTUMS WITHOUT THROWING UP ALL OVER HIMSELF!
Therefore, there is no doubt in my mind that this research committee was made up of entirely gay, cock slobbering researchers.

Nice try JSC, but some of us aren't buying into the lie, your homosexual community is trying to brainwash us with.

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

uh, fuggity fuggity fuggin rack?
Innnnnnnndoooooobidibly!
The same pole smokers who do these bogus studies remind me of the fat ass female "scientist" who "proves" that all women have genes that cause more fat to develop in their ass and hips.
Fatass women are not fat because of their lack of exercise or the 10 Twinkies, bag of Doritoes and Diet Coke they had as a "snack," but from a "natural female gene."

Just bullshit to make them feel better.

But back to El's point- I'd rather just say, "Ok, your studies are all correct" than be subject to watching.....shudder....the two worst words in the English Dictionary....gay porn. FUCK!
Even if these straight dudes actually DID sit down and watch this...I also like how the study mentioned that the subjects had to watch male on male as well as lesbians. Well of course those dudes popped woods after seeing the lesbo action- unless it was IB and one of her fellow buzz-cut carpet-munchers going at it.....

------------------
fukk me running
February 5th, 2002, 07:24 PM
DrDetroit

RACKS to El for his incessant militancy against the gay lifestyle. Also, RACKS to Smackie and Meds for carrying on a fairly good conversation, although Smackie clearly smacks Meds pretty good, exposing Meds for his many generalizations and stereotypes.

On the one hand, folks who CHOOSE to be gay, I have no problem with. I feel neither threatened nor concerned that ?Gays are gonna take over the world? as El would have you believe.

On the other hand, I do feel that homosexuality is a deviant sexual behavior. Inasmuch, I do believe that permitting ?life-partners, http://www.hostboard.com/forums/ ? to adopt children will lend itself to those people pressuring their adopted children to assume that lifestyle, as it is a learned trait, i.e., University of Michigan offering the course, ?How To Be Gay.?

No one has concluded that being gay/homo is a genetic trait. Some studies have purported to ?suggest? that ?correlation?s? exists, but no conclusive evidence, and until I see that, being gay/homo is being a sexual deviant.
February 5th, 2002, 07:49 PM
Friend Of Ours

Indeed, the issue is protecting kids from possible abuse by the adults charged with their care. Now, consider that virtually ZERO percent of the (admittedly few) homo adoptive couples have ever been charged with abuse, while INNUMERABLE hetero couples--mostly birth parents, but MANY foster and adoptive parents as well--have been charged and found guilty. Therefore, your "argument" (which as usual is no argument at all, since you forgot to supply an actual body of thought beneath your typically terse and brittle declearitive statement) is left twisting in the wind like a dried whispy husk.

Fact is, adopive parents are statistically the least probable abusers, neglectors, etc. And this goes for homo as well as hetero. That this basic fact eludes you in your stupid and uninformed bigotry is par for your putt-putt mind.

Fact is, the priesthood has ALWAYS been a standard repository for boys who are "different." Same with nuns. The percentages rival those of a WNBA team.

As for the essential "deviance" of homosexuals--or, more precisely, those who practise homosexual acts--well, many of the greatest Greeks and Romans (among other ancient cultures) practised homosexuality. Are you saying that Caesar was a mentally ill pervert? Alchibiades? Alexander The Great? Themistocles? Cicero?

And what about the great men and women of our culture who practised homesexual acts? How about Schubert? Standing 4'10", his genius and contributions to the world dwarfs your puny ambitions and stupid bigotry.

How about Stephen Sondheim, Leonard Bernstein, Aaron Copland? Who are you pathetic pee-on born-agains to say anything? Your ONLY appropriate action in this world is to pay homage to the genius of such men, their greatness and vigor.

Now what the fuck have you got to say to Julius Caesar?

------------------
February 5th, 2002, 08:00 PM
ElGRANDPEEHOLE

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally Posted By The 80's Man:
"Well of course those dudes popped woods after seeing the lesbo action- unless it was IB and one of her fellow buzz-cut carpet-munchers going at it....."<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

BAAARRRRRFFFFFFFFF.........!

I don't know which would be worse. Watching IB go at it hot and heavy with her male...errrr...wanna be male lover, or two men tearing into one anothers rectums!

~shudder~

------------------
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Dr Bob:
TTB, I see. Kinda like the game fuck your buddy, or screw your neighbor, or whatever it is called. Actually sounds like a lot of fun....<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
February 5th, 2002, 08:03 PM
kernel

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Friend Of Ours:

Now what the fuck have you got to say to Julius Caesar?

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Et tu, faggot?

------------------
"Mongo only pawn in game of life"
February 5th, 2002, 08:09 PM
ElGRANDPEEHOLE

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally Posted By Friend of Queers:
"Are you saying that Caesar was a mentally ill pervert? Alchibiades? Alexander The Great? Themistocles? Cicero?"<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

If any of them actually used another mans tubestake as a mounting pony, then the answer is A BIG FAT YES! They were sick perverted wackos.
And if these civilizations did endulge in such perverse behavior, then thank God those civilizations no longer exist! And if homosexuality continues to spread at such a rampant rate here in America, then we too are doomed to the same fate as these once great civilizations. All because some pervert couldn't keep his fucking prick out of another mans fecal incrusted asshole:rolleyesatthethought:

Dr. (still carrying on the charde) Detroit,

In a way you and I finally see eye to eye on something.
PROPS for at least having enough sense to realize homosexuality is sick, and an abomination of nature!

------------------
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Dr Bob:
TTB, I see. Kinda like the game fuck your buddy, or screw your neighbor, or whatever it is called. Actually sounds like a lot of fun....<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
February 5th, 2002, 08:17 PM
ElGRANDPEEHOLE

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally Posted By Kornhole:
Et tu, faggot?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!
RACK

------------------
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Dr Bob:
TTB, I see. Kinda like the game fuck your buddy, or screw your neighbor, or whatever it is called. Actually sounds like a lot of fun....<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
February 5th, 2002, 08:25 PM
Incoherent Grandstander

I'm just so staggered by the brilliance of Friend of Ours that I can't formulate any coherent thoughts, much less a cogent argument to dream of countering this seemingly unassailable philosophical, logical and verbal masterpiece. But here goes...deep breath.....

1. Fag.
2. Go fecalize your frank.
3. We know you are, but what are we ?

Thanks. Hope I didn't let down Team Dontblowyournutsackinhisbuttcrack.

------------------
February 5th, 2002, 08:29 PM
Incoherent Grandstander

I'm just so staggered by the brilliance of Friend of Ours that I can't formulate any coherent thoughts, much less a cogent argument to dream of countering this seemingly unassailable philosophical, logical and verbal masterpiece. But here goes...deep breath.....

1. Fag.
2. Go fecalize your frank.
3. We know you are, but what are we ?

Thanks. Hope I didn't let down Team Dontblowyournutsackinhisbuttcrack.

------------------
February 5th, 2002, 08:29 PM
Norm Johnson

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by kernel:

Et tu, faggot?

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

RACK. Fuck Friend of Ours. Shubert was a short little faggot. So is Elton John. TOo bad they can't take those worldy contributions to hell.

------------------
you can always pound it through the uprights... if you're using a Norm Johnson.
February 5th, 2002, 08:54 PM
rozy

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by kernel:

Et tu, faggot?

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

The hardest I've laughed in quite a while.
Major RACK!!

------------------
February 5th, 2002, 09:28 PM
canibus

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Hey, who's this "God" you keep referring to? Any evidence for any such being or presence--beyond your inner gut feeling?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

READ YOUR BIBLE!!!! And if your predicted following statement is going to be "the bible is archaic and probably written by drunk middle easterners", do some research on the "Dead Sea Scrolls." There is a definite creator of the earth. But to become a believer in that, you have to be willing to have the blindfold Satan has put over your mind (2cor 4:11), removed.

The people of Corinth were warned to abstain from homosexuality. Sodom and Gomorrah was destroyed because of men lying with men and women conceding to lude acts with women. This is in any translation of the bible today but CAN BE PROVED THROUGH HISTORY!!!!! True, homosexuality was not the sole reason for destruction. Immorality and unfaithfulness to god was.

But being a God fearing person is not the point at hand. Many do not believe in god. So lets look at it from a logical standpoint...even medically. The human rectal cavity is not made for entrance. The tissue and muscles embedded in the tissue are made for pushing matter out...not in. So driving a penis, dildo or any foreign object up your ass is abnormal, plain and simple.

Now to women. Though it may seem a little less abhorring to see two beautiful women go at it, it's still wrong. That type of sexual act, back in the "biblical period" had a Greek translation of pornia. Those acts were forbidden and shunned. One may argue that we are not under "Levitical law". That law still stood after and holds true today. Levitical or not. "Homosexual will not inherit God's Kingdom."

Homosexuality is wrong. If animals were made, created, evolved...(whatever floats your boat) less than humans, do you see any animal (besides 1 or 2 sporadic cases) shunning the opposite sex and engaging in same sex courtship???

I don't feel militant gay bashing is right. I don't feel condoning it is right either. But as this world gets more and more desensitized as to immoral behavior, you'll see it more on TV and all around. Sucks but it's that way.

L8

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page